Problem: Carbon emissions
People love to eat shrimp, but some estimates place their carbon impact as higher than even beef, mostly due to the destruction of natural habitats near shrimp farms.
Technology: Algae Shrimp
New Wave Foods has developed a highly realistic synthetic shrimp that is made out of algae, which is ubiquitous and solidly occupies a bottom rung on the food chain.
Algae needs only sunlight, water and CO2 to grow. In contrast shrimp are fed wild-caught fish. Producing 1 pound of shrimp is estimated to use up three pounds of fish.
Algae uses CO2 to perform photosynthesis, serving to convert carbon into useable, sequestered energy (food calories).
Scientists analyzed and mimicked the molecular structure of shrimp flesh in order to create a realistic substitute out of red algae.
The shrimp industry globally utilizes a lot of slave labor, particularly for removing the shells and appendages. Algae shrimp does not require anything preening, which could eliminate the worst labor practices.
Early adopters including Google’s cafeteria
New Wave Foods
Steps to implementation:
1) Run pilot at Google cafeteria.
2) Perform sustainability analysis of algae farms and production plants.
3) Develop campaign to fight misconceptions of algae as food.
Over 30 billions tons of concrete are produced every year. Cement, main component of concrete, emits 0.8 tons of CO2 per ton of cement produced. This is about 7% of total global CO2 emissions. First source comes from CO2 released from limestone to produce lime. The second source is from lime and clay being heated to 1450 degrees celsius to make cement. UCLA research is trying to create a close loop process.
CO2 released from limestone to produce lime gets captured
Energy and climate: in order to mitigate the climate impacts of burning fossil fuels, power plants capture carbon dioxide from flue gases for permanent storage or alternative uses. Amine-based and other liquid absorption methods are complex and have a high parasitic energy load (considerable energy is required to regenerate the material), so there is a need for highly efficient solid absorption materials.
Scientists at the University of York have developed a method for producing mesoporous carbon materials from waste biomass.
The process involves the carbonization of polysaccharides by heating to high temperatures – creating materials which selectively bind CO2 from a gas stream, and are easily regenerated under vacuum.
The properties of the “starbons” produced differ depending on the temperature and time applied to the biomass.
Some starbons capture as much as 65% more carbon dioxide than conventional activated carbon.
3. Organizational Stakeholders
Starbons have already been commercialized for other applications, such as catalysis and chromatographic separations, but are not yet available for carbon capture. Stakeholders in this process will include:
Owners and managers of power plants
The next three stages in deploying this technology could be:
UoY researchers and Starbon Technologies: characterize the optimal material, and commercially produce a starbon for carbon capture
Power plants with solid-state carbon capture: phase in starbon to replace activated carbon
Power plants with liquid-state carbon capture: investigate opportunities to redesign carbon capture systems to incorporate solid capture materials
CO2 released when burning fossil fuels leads to global warming
Turn carbon capture into stone and store underground!
In Iceland, scientists turned carbon into stone by pumping a power plant’s carbon dioxide into underground basalt and mixed them with water. The process chemically solidified the carbon dioxide and changed the basalt and CO2 into a chalk like substance.
The solidifying process takes 2 years, whereas it was originally assumed to take decades.
The solidification resolves the risk that carbon stored underground as gas or slurry could accidentally be released into the atmosphere.
Its currently unclear whether the process could work with many types of basalt or saltwater as opposed to freshwater
Governments trying to meet CO2 cap commitments
Power plants trying to limit CO2 due to regulations or cap and trade limits/incentives
Citizens who benefit from avoiding the impacts of global warming
Coastal cities/regions and other high risk localities that have to plan and pay for warming mitigation and adaption
First 3 steps for deployment:
Additional studies of types of basalt and water required for the reaction (including testing factors that affect the duration of the reaction)
Analysis of potential geographic locations and power plants that have the proper basalt formations and could make use of the technology
Cost analysis and funding models to determine how much the technology will cost to use and which stakeholders should contribute to the costs
Sustainability Problem: Increasing anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions in the atmosphere causes global warming
Areas of Sustainability: Energy, Water, Waste, Safety, Health
Artist’s conception of the Columbia researchers’ artificial trees. Photo credit: Stonehaven Productions Inc.
Technology: Artificial Trees
In Yale Climate Connections article “Artificial Trees as a Carbon Capture Alternative to Geoengineering,” Richard Schiffman explains the “carbon capture” project of Columbia University Earth Institute scientists Klaus Lackner and Allen Wright. The technology aims to to absorb carbon dioxide using sodium carbonate in the streamers of artificial trees that look like shag rugs and scrub brushes. The researchers would like to make carbon capturing “forests” using artificial trees.
Each “tree”, approximately as big and with roughly the same production cost as a car, can absorb carbon produced by 36 cars in a day. It will take 10 million of these “trees” to capture 12 percent of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions per year. A gentle flow of water can release carbon dioxide from the artificial trees. Carbon dioxide can then be buried underground or can be used for industrial purposes.
This technology is not geoengineering. “It does not actively interferes with the dynamics of a system you don’t understand” according to Lackner.
Artificial tree proved to be one of the first technologies to be able to “remove vehicular carbon emissions from the air”.